Perforated
metal is commonly used to enclose electrical equipments to attenuate the EMI/
RFI radiation they release and to ventilate them at the same time. Many
questions occur about which perforated pattern is fit to meet the design
requirements and shielding effectiveness of different perforated patterns and
materials.
Shielding
effectiveness of 40 dB offers 99% attenuation of the electromagnetic radiation
while a shielding effectiveness of 92 dB, the maximum shielding effectiveness
offered to provide 99.997% attenuation. A shielding effectiveness of 40 dB is
minimum in common applications. Effective shielding was offered by most samples
to frequencies of 7GHz. Beyond that frequency some samples reduced below 99%
effective, however some samples remained easily above 75% effective even at the
maximum frequency level of 10 GHz. The conclusion is that there are various
perforated patterns to be chosen by designers to meet their design needs.
The major
single source of leakage is contact surfaces between two components. If a
tightly sealed electrical connection is not made, leakage through interface can
be more than through structure.
Pressure
loss through perforated plate
In various
perforated plate applications, the estimated energy loss or pressure loss
through plates is one of the design factors. A lab system maintain a
non-swirling flow impacting perpendicularly on the sample. Different perforated
gauge plates were inserted in a uniform velocity air flow stream. Pressure loss
for ambient air flow was then measured at a range of velocities and counted as
inches of water column loss for ever flow. It provides the best flow condition
value of loss.
Pressureloss by decorative wire mesh can be measured depending on ratio of anticipated velocity of the
highest tabulated velocity. This ratio squared multiplied by the tabulated
pressure loss can be used to approximate the higher velocity loss. Pressure
loss can be evaluated from the different gas density values by using the ratio
of the expected gas density to the measured density as a multiplier of the
measured loss. Distorted flow patterns with high velocity zones increase the
plate loss, as direction flow will not perpendicular to the plate surface.
To punch
that array of holes needs special cluster tooling that not just is costly even
also takes time to develop. Additionally the tooling you make will be limited
in its service on a specific material
and a limited range of thickness because of clearance requirements. If the type
and thickness of a material for a component changes, new tools will be
required.
Punching
the holes with a cluster tool, simply as the name refers, allows punching only
a small cluster of holes with every stroke of the press. The machine time
needed will make the holes very costly.
Maintaining
accuracy in the arrangement of holes and uniformity in their spacing will be
tough due to the damage in the work piece that occurs with each press stroke.
When the
component is prepared from the punching process, it will be deformed and
require flattening. Without a roller leveler, you will require to send the
component to retain the shape. It means even more time and money.
No comments:
Post a Comment