Contaminant loading in a filter element is
eventually the process of blocking the pores throughout the element. The filter
element becomes blocked with contaminant particles, there are few pores of
fluid flow and pressure needed to keep flow through media improves. Basically
the differential pressure across the element improves nominally as there is an
abundance of media pores for the fluid to pass through and pore blocking
process has nominal effect on the overall pressure loss. Although, point is reached at which
successive blocking of media pores nominally reduces the count of available
pores for flow through the element.
At this level the differential pressure
across the element rise exponentially, the magnitude, size, shape and
arrangement of pores throughout the element for why some elements last longer
than others. For a specific filter media thickness and filtration rating, there
are fewer pores with cellulose media than fiberglass media. The contaminant
loading process would block the pores of filter media element quicker then
identical mesh media.
The mesh element is relatively uninfluenced
by contaminant loading for a longer time. The element selectively captures the
different size particles, as the fluid flows through the element. The small
pores in the media are not blocked by large particles. These downstream small
pores available for the large magnitude of small particles present in the
fluid.
The element loads with contamination, the
differential pressure will improve over time, nominally initially, then soon as
the element it’s maximum life.
Every sintered mesh filter element follows a
characteristic pressure differential versus contaminant loading relationship
that is referred as filter element life profile. The practical life profile is
definitely affected by the system application conditions. Variations in the
system flow rate and fluid viscosity affect the clean pressure differential
throughout the filter element and have a specific effect on the element life.
The filter element life profile is hard to
evaluate in service systems. The system operation against idle time, the duty
cycle and the changing ambient contaminant conditions all influence the life
profile of the filter element. Additionally, the precise instrumentation for
recording the variations in the pressure loss in the filter element is seldom
available. Many machinery users and designers describe filter housings with
differential pressure indicators to describe when the filter element should be
replaced.
With Multipass test data, pressure
differential versus contaminant loading relationship, stated as the filter
element life profile. These service conditions
like flow rate and fluid viscosity affect the life profile of a filter
element. In order to compare the life profiles of different mesh element these
service conditions should be same and filter elements should be of same size. Then
magnitude, size, shape and arrangement of pores in the filter element describe
the characteristic life profile.
Pressure Ratings
Position of the filter in the circuit is
the basic determinant of pressure rating. The housings are normally designed
for three areas in a circuit- suction, pressure or return lines. A feature of
these locations is their higher operating pressures. Suction and return line
filters are normally designed for minimum pressure about 34 bar.
No comments:
Post a Comment